thank you Laurel ❤️ also I really like your framing—Rooney/Peters/Luster for me are all operating in this space of frank discussions of sexuality (often trans/queer sexuality) + some attention to precarity and material conditions and class + very colloquially charming but not unsophisticated writing
thank you Laurel ❤️ also I really like your framing—Rooney/Peters/Luster for me are all operating in this space of frank discussions of sexuality (often trans/queer sexuality) + some attention to precarity and material conditions and class + very colloquially charming but not unsophisticated writing
I also really admire how well-structured the plot is for Peters's book—it's so genuinely CONSUMABLE as a novel, I couldn't stop reading it and then couldn't stop talking about it after I'd finished
yes!!! to the structure of peters' book, i SO admire a book that tells a story non-linearly without being confusing or taking you out of the rhythm of the book.
PS: my brilliant friend/the neapolitan quartet is so timeless that i would argue it's "moment" is whenever you want a book that makes you feel something
thank you Laurel ❤️ also I really like your framing—Rooney/Peters/Luster for me are all operating in this space of frank discussions of sexuality (often trans/queer sexuality) + some attention to precarity and material conditions and class + very colloquially charming but not unsophisticated writing
I also really admire how well-structured the plot is for Peters's book—it's so genuinely CONSUMABLE as a novel, I couldn't stop reading it and then couldn't stop talking about it after I'd finished
yes!!! to the structure of peters' book, i SO admire a book that tells a story non-linearly without being confusing or taking you out of the rhythm of the book.
PS: my brilliant friend/the neapolitan quartet is so timeless that i would argue it's "moment" is whenever you want a book that makes you feel something